There are certain writers that I think
I love because when I reread their books from my teen years they TAKE
ME BACK! These are the books that I read, not so much because the
writing is good (although I know for a fact that Marilyn Singer,
Robin McKinley and Maud Hart Lovelace all hold up) but because the
stories are so entrenched in my teen experience that I suspect I
can't separate my inner 14 year old from the quality of the writing.
I am trying to reread the books of my
youth with a modern eye. I can't wait to reread SUMMER OF MY GERMANSOLDIER. It seemed earth-changing to me as a young woman. They had
Jewish people in the SOUTH?? During WWII? I thought they all lived
with the All of a Kind Family on the Lower East Side. Or on the Upper West Side with the Norma Klein
girls whose stories I used to have to hide under my bed! (I was
seriously obsessed with New York and desperately wanted to be Jewish
when I was in middle school. Someday I will tell the story about when
we moved from Ohio to Long Island and I met my gym partner, Laura
Greenberg. Most awkward-ly well-meaning-ly pro-semitic
conversation ever.)
I have a bunch of one-offs I have loved
for years. RONNIE AND ROSEY by Julie Angell, TUNE IN YESTERDAY by the
gloriously named T. Ernesto Bethancourt and THE BOOK OF PHOEBE by
Mary-Ann Tirone Smith.
Then there are the authors where I read
some, but not all, of their books. I read and re-read the ones at my
library, but didn't have access to all of them. There are the
well-known classics of Beverly Cleary, Edward Eager and, I would
argue, Ellen Conford. And then there's my beloved American history
guide – Patricia Clapp.
First of all, did you know that
CONSTANCE: A STORY OF EARLY PLYMOUTH was her first book and she wrote
it when she was 56? And it was a runner-up for the National Book
Award for Children's Books? What a great second, or third act for
Mrs. Clapp! And how does she not have a wikipedia page? I find it
hard to believe that the lovely girl from my town who came in third on
American Idol has 3000+ words and yet the woman who gave the world
page 70 of I'M DEBORAH SAMPSON has nary a mention.
To begin, CONSTANCE. In 1988 I
interviewed to be an historical interpreter at Plimoth Plantation in
Plymouth, Mass. One of the bennies of
going to interview is that I got a free day-pass to the site. I
wandered around, it was beautiful. I was pretty sure I wasn't going
to take the job – it would have meant a hour plus commute. But I
had to go to Plimoth after having spent so many hours there with my
pal Constance as a kid.
Imagine my joy when I MET Constance Hopkins Snow and told her I had read a book about her. She was very dismissive and said something like, “Many half-truths are told by people
claiming to know me.” Which clearly showed she was a dud. I would
have been like - “Let me tell you about the time the Edwards dueled
nearly to the death for my love!”
I just reread CONSTANCE around
Thanksgiving this year. I don't connect with Constance as a
character, but I respect and admire her and other than some
ham-handed Native American descriptions, it was till A-OK with me.
I AM DEBORAH SAMPSON – good Lord,
this book was steamy. I mean, not the parts with the war, or the
lonliness of colonial poverty, but the Deborah and Robbie love story
was smokin'! The used copy I bought a few years ago flips right open
to page 70 and it is an ex-libris book from the Sacramento Public
Library, so clearly I was not the only historical horn-dog of the
late 1970s...
Rereadng this last month I was
surprised at how much better it was than I remembered it. I read it
as an adolescent obsessed with the romance, but the details about
colonial life were fascinating to me as an old bag. Deborah's life
being taken in by an emotionally distant relative, her friendship
with the local pastor, her eventual boarding with a loving family and
her daring to defy gender roles to join the fight that took her
beloved away were all beautifully rendered. I remain a huge fan.
I am in the midst of reading JANE-EMILY
– a ghost story set in Lynn, Massachusetts, a mere two towns over
from where I now reside. I liked it fine as a kid, but it was kind of
an also-ran next to CONSTANCE and DEBORAH. Maybe because the main
character is neither Jane nor Emily, but rather 18 year old Louisa,
Jane's aunt. Louisa has had to leave her Edwardian-hipster boyfriend
Martin to take her orphaned niece Jane to stay with Jane's grandmother
Mrs. Canfield in her hella-haunted house in Lynn.
The ghostly presence is Emily – a
spoiled brat who died of self-inflicted pneumonia when she was 12-ish.
Emily sucks. Alive or dead, she is a treacherous little beastie – a
melter of wax doll faces and a hogger of reflecting garden balls. She
did the world a favor by expiring early, but she has a hold on Jane
that is pretty creepy.
I am noticing the
turn-of-the-20th-century details more this time around. I am
currently on page 87 of my modern-day reread. So far, no hot humping
on the farm a la DEBORAH, but there is a slightly mansplainy doctor
who is taking an interest in Louisa who seems promising. I'll power
through.
My love for Patricia Clapp remains
constant. (Ha! Get it? Like Constance?) If you will excuse me, I
think I will go try to make a wikipedia page for her.
I LOVE Jane-Emily and have never been able to get into CONSTANCE, the first chapter bores me silly. But J-E - love, love. You've seen my gazing ball, right? I cannot bring myself to peer into it due to fear of haunting. Do you own DEBORAH and can I borrow it? xox
ReplyDeleteI like Jane-Emily the best but OF COURSE I love Constance too. Clapp loved her because descended from her. The Tamarack Tree is also good but not as good as the others. I don't really remember Deborah Sampson except historically and I never read The Witches' Children.
ReplyDelete